Back to Metroland's Home Page!
 Site Search
   Search Metroland.Net
 Classifieds
   View Classified Ads
   Place a Classified Ad
 Personals
   Online Personals
   Place A Print Ad
 Columns & Opinions
   The Simple Life
   Comment
   Looking Up
   Reckonings
   Opinion
   Myth America
   Letters
   Rapp On This
 News & Features
   Newsfront
   Features
   What a Week
   Loose Ends
 Lifestyles
   This Week's Review
   The Dining Guide
   Leftovers
   Scenery
   Tech Life
 Cinema & Video
   Weekly Reviews
   The Movie Schedule
 Music
   Listen Here
   Live
   Recordings
   Noteworthy
 Arts
   Theater
   Dance
   Art
   Classical
   Books
   Art Murmur
 Calendar
   Night & Day
   Event Listings
 AccuWeather
 About Metroland
   Where We Are
   Who We Are
   What We Do
   Work For Us
   Place An Ad
 

 

Simple Is Bliss

It isn’t the money spent, or the destination reached, that makes your wedding a day to remember

By Laura Leon

 

Recently, a relative had one of those destination weddings that have become so popular of late. At the time, there was some grumbling among the family members, as the place the bridal couple had chosen was one that was tricky getting to—Nantucket—and this was before record gales caused the interruption of transportation to and from the island. Suffice it to say, the wedding went off, despite torrential downpours and the fact that some of us didn’t make it. By all accounts it was beautiful and a riotous good time, but the whole thing left me with something of a bad taste in my mouth.

What is it about weddings these days that make couples want to spend on their big day what could be a significant down payment on a home, or force family and loved ones to dish out big bucks for travel to and from said extravaganza? The weddings I’ve heard and read about lately—and I am not talking about celebrities, just regular folk—entail lavish gifts for the guests, and flowers and photography that run upwards of $10,000 each. And more and more brides are doing the Melina Trump thing in which they have more than one gown for the occasion.

In the quest toward achieving some sort of mini-celebrity in their own right, these brides—and I’m going to be sexist here and lay the blame squarely at their feet, because I can’t imagine that there are a lot of men out there just aching to spend significant prenuptial time discussing things like what kind of petals the nine flower girls will pour forth from their darling little baskets—have removed from the wedding ceremony precisely what makes it so meaningful. In other words, the personal, spiritual and community aspects of exchanging vows have been replaced by one big old pig fest. At the end of the day, one remembers the color the bridesmaids wore, or whether the prime rib was cooked to perfection, but nothing at all of the supposed meaning of the ceremony.

If you’re concerned that you might be going overboard in planning your wedding, or you’d just like some ideas on how to keep it simple, here are some suggestions. First of all, consider who really should be at your wedding. On the one hand, you might think of it as a party, and therefore, the more the merrier. However, depending on your budget and your deepest inclinations, you may wish to keep the guest list to the actual ceremony small. Many bridal couples of late have done the elopement followed by a big reception several weeks later, which can be a nice choice unless said elopement removes you from those to whom you are closest, and whose companionship on this special day are of paramount importance.

While most people don’t live in the kinds of houses, with the kinds of help, that make the at-home wedding and/or reception an obvious option, I’ve heard of plenty of modern couples who have decided to do a backyard wedding at their childhood home. The ones of this sort that I’ve been to have been, without exception, perfectly lovely, with a deep and underlying sense of family. Whether the reception fare has been potluck or a catered lunch, the mood has been convivial (especially if it’s an outdoor wedding, since, of course, food eaten out of doors is always so much more succulent). The money that is saved in renting out a big hall or hotel could, for instance, be used in setting a spectacular stage with flowers and trees, unless you’re lucky enough to come from a family who can do that sort of thing on their own.

Or, if you have the space, consider hiring a really great band, the kind that really gets everybody revved up for hours of dancing. I’m still envious of the cousin who got married in the simple local church, then led a contingent to her grandfather’s farm, where picnic tables were festooned with gingham tablecloths and wild flowers, and friends helped out with barbecuing chicken and spare ribs and grilling corn. Best of all, she chose the kind of aforementioned band that helped to make this one of the greatest weddings I’ve ever attended.

While I’m not suggesting that you take the cheap route—anyone who knows me knows that’s not my style—there are ways in which economy and simplification can be achieved with wonderful results. For instance, why is it that we’ve been brainwashed into thinking that 99 percent of all weddings should take place over the weekend? Sure, I realize that people work, but if they love you, they can take a day or two off to enjoy your Tuesday wedding. What a nice break to the monotony of a regular week, and, added bonus, it’s usually less expensive to plan an event at, say, a lakeside hotel or hillside mansion midweek as opposed to the weekend. (Your guests will also thank you for freeing up their weekend).

Similarly, why are so many people sucked into the notion that weddings—particularly “elegant” weddings—must be in the evening? Granted, there are rules of dress, but it wasn’t so long ago that one would regularly be invited to a late-morning wedding of considerable sophistication, which would be followed by a stately lunch or, back in the day, a wedding breakfast. Another relative’s wedding was rather a small one, in a church, but was followed by a festive wedding brunch at a local restaurant. If I recall, the guests were served things like eggs benedict and sliced ham, with juices and champagne, and, of course, a cake. I think because of the scarcity of this kind of event nowadays, it could be really novel, and one could finish the day with all the guests (having changed, of course) going hiking, ice skating, for a swim, etc.

If you and your loved one are into sailing, wouldn’t it be exciting to have an on-the-seas (or lake or river) ceremony, in which the cruise was part of the festivities? Or, if you’re more into skiing, what about inviting your closest friends and family to a romantic lodge, where you have a fireside wedding followed by a rustic repast, and then spend the next day or two skiing? Neither of these ideas has to entail renting the QE2 or flying everybody to Steamboat Springs; think about what is meaningful to you, and realize that there are so many wonderful places and venues nearby that could make your day spectacular to both you and your loved ones.

Obviously, the budget that you set and the choices you make for your wedding are intensely personal. But as you prepare for your wedding, don’t get sucked into the idea that you have to spend so much on the flowers, or the videography, or whatever, in order to ensure a magical, memorable event. In the end, nobody will remember, nor will it matter, whether you had flowers in front of each pew, or one amazing centerpiece at the altar; what matters is that you make it the kind of day that emphasizes and reiterates all that is most important to you, now and going forth.

 

2008 Bridal Guide Home


Send A Letter to Our Editor
Back Home
   
 
 
 
 
Copyright © 2002 Lou Communications, Inc., 419 Madison Ave., Albany, NY 12210. All rights reserved.