 |
|
Portrait
of a wolf: McGregor in Young Adam.
|
Original
Sins
By
Ann Morrow
Young
Adam
Directed
by David Mackenzie
In the opening of the Scottish film Young Adam, the
camera follows the gentle glide of a swan. It’s the only gentle
image there is; the lulling, underwater filming of the swan’s
paddling soon takes the camera to another floating creature,
a drowned woman whose white slip envelops her paleness like
a halo. The body is fished out of the river by Joe Taylor
(Ewan McGregor), who is quickly aided by his employer, Les
(Peter Mullan). Joe’s detached quietude at their disturbing
discovery is gradually explained: He knew the woman, although
he tells no one.
Adapted from Alexander Trocchi’s “sexistentialist” novel by
director David Mackenzie, Young Adam follows Joe, a
womanizing drifter, as he sinks deeper into guilt and loneliness.
Once an aspiring writer, he is now a menial laborer aboard
a coal barge. He lives with Les and his wife, Ella (Tilda
Swinton), and their young son in a cramped below-deck cabin.
After a brusque prelude, Joe and Ella plunge into an affair
that is based on a mutual and brazen disregard for Les, a
naïve oaf preoccupied with drinking and gambling. As the adulterous
fling solidifies into a relationship, Joe’s feverish memories
reveal that he is haunted by his former girlfriend, Cathie
(Emily Mortimer), a girl he dominated and exploited. Meanwhile
the police have classified the drowning death as a murder.
Set against the picturesquely grimy background of postwar
Glasgow, Young Adam is a character study framed as
a thriller. If Joe has any awareness of how his compulsive
womanizing creates chaos for himself and others, it certainly
doesn’t bother him any. Yet there doesn’t seem to be much
joy in his conquests, despite his wolfish confidence—like
everything else in the lives of these working poor, sex is
a grim business. Occasionally, a pleased, egotistical sneer
crosses his troubled countenance, and by the end, his self
absorption reaches nearly monstrous proportions. Even so,
he remains likable on sheer attractiveness. This is arguably
McGregor’s most subtle performance, and the lack of artifice
only plays up his roguish good looks.
He’s matched in subdued intensity by Swinton: Ella may be
coarsened by work and weather, but she is more than the drab
scold she first appears. After the inevitable disillusionment
with Joe, she shows herself to be made of sterner, finer stuff.
Mullan as the cuckolded Les is equally memorable. In fact,
it’s the acting, as well as Giles Nuttgens’ lustrously dank
cinematography, that make Young Adam so absorbing;
otherwise, this bleak and remorseless crime drama would be
just another exercise in meaningless alienation.
Pleasure
in Pain
DodgeBall:
A True Underdog Story
Directed
by Rawson Marshall Thurber
A movie about dodgeball—pure genius. Why didn’t someone think
of this before? While many folks have traumatic memories of
being sadistically pelted with those red rubber balls in gym
class, many more remember the sheer fun of playing a game
without a lot of complicated rules or elaborate equipment.
Most of all, to be specific to this movie, imagine the joy
of seeing a group of not-very-good athletes, led by Vince
Vaughn, get the crap beat out of them by a Girl Scout troop.
One of the essences of comedy is the spectator’s enjoyment
of someone else’s misfortune. (The Germans have a wonderful
word for it, schadenfreude.) DodgeBall: A True Underdog
Story generously caters to this urge, allowing the audience
to laugh at grown men and women being struck down, painfully,
by blunt objects.
There’s a story, of course, but it doesn’t get in the way
of the fun. Shlubby Peter LaFleur (Vaughn) owns the working-class
Average Joe’s gym. It’s a place for regular guys like Gordon
(Stephen Root), an obscure-sports fanatic, and Steve (Alan
Tudyk), who thinks he’s a pirate. (Steve’s favorite phrase:
“Garrh.”) Just across the street is Globo Gym, a high-tech
nightmare run by White Goodman (Ben Stiller), an oiled-up,
mustached moron with an absurdly high opinion of himself.
White buys up Average Joe’s mortgage and forecloses; Peter
and his posse have 30 days to raise $50,000. It just so happens
that there’s a dodgeball tournament that will pay $50,000
to the winner.
Along with the violence, it’s the performances that make the
film so much fun. Bleary-eyed Vaughn plays his laid-back character
as if he had a perpetual hangover—though from what, it’s hard
to say. (Life?) Nothing can make him upset, and when insulted,
he shrugs it off with Zenlike ease. Stiller, on the other
hand, creates a repellent character of exuberant obnoxiousness
and horrific neuroses. He’s hilarious, proving that he does
his best work playing characters with no redeeming value.
Also on hand is scene-stealing Rip Torn as Patches O’Houlihan,
a wheelchair-bound wretch who was once a dodgeball legend.
The training regimen he comes up with for the Average Joe’s
team can be summed up in two quotes: “If you can dodge a wrench,
you can dodge a ball,” and “If you can dodge a car, you can
dodge a ball.”
Yes, the movie has the obligatory tasteless jokes of the moment,
including girly-girl bisexual babes making out for no good
reason and pets licking inappropriate body parts. Yes, it
has the kind of last-minute-heroics that were clichéd in 1935.
It doesn’t matter. DodgeBall is, in large part, so
appropriately tasteless that it transcends the moments of
obvious stupidity.
—Shawn
Stone
Defective
Product
The
Terminal
Directed
by Steven Spielberg
If it wasn’t for the occasionally amusing, cutesy scenario
and its professionally breezy pace, The Terminal might
not be recognizable as a Steven Spielberg film. The director
might like to bend reality in service to a deeper purpose,
but for this absurdly fluffy comedy (based on a story by Andrew
Niccol of The Truman Show), his disregard for real
life, or even common sense, is just plain sloppy. Perhaps
intended as a parable of the immigrant experience in America,
The Terminal subverts its own shallow folklore—derived
from Being There, Forest Gump, and any other
Great American Experience movie starring an idiot savant—to
the point where it’s pointless. Consider it a Spielberg knockoff.
The intrepid immigrant stranded in a New York airport is Viktor
Novorski, whose cutesy naiveté would’ve been intolerable if
he had been played by anyone but Tom Hanks. Overweight and
mugging more than usual, Hanks still manages to employ his
boyish charm to allow Viktor to overcome his language handicap
and reveal himself as a savvy, rather than savant, voyager
through the United States legal system. While en route to
New York from his Eastern European homeland of Krakozia, Viktor
becomes a citizen of Nowhere: A coup has rendered Krakozia
nonexistent and his passport invalid. Not knowing what else
to do with him, airport commandant Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci)
confines Viktor to the expansive airport terminal. Frank is
aghast that Viktor takes his edict literally, but then Viktor
comes from a country where disobeying authority often results
in a quick execution. Exacerbating Viktor’s dilemma, and providing
ample opportunity for cheap humor, is the fact that he doesn’t
speak English, at least not at first. (Within days, Viktor
teaches himself enough English to suss out the food court.)
For reasons of contrived convenience, there isn’t a single
person around who speaks Russian, or any of the other Slavic
languages Viktor speaks, to act as translator.
To make a long movie short (and Niccol’s story would’ve been
much wittier as a short film), resourceful Viktor outmaneuvers
airport security, triumphs over adversity (by returning carts
for enough quarters to buy food), becomes part of a community
(composed of three airport-staff misfits), falls in love with
a lovelorn stewardess (Catherine Zeta-Jones) and gets a job
and climbs the social ladder. All within the confines of the
terminal, which is meant to be a stand-in for the immigrant
haven of New York City except that it resembles nothing else
except a shopping emporium with departure gates. And that
Viktor’s three friends are too childish to take seriously,
especially the Indian janitor (Barry Shabaka-Henley) who likes
to watch people slip on wet, soapy floors. And that his love
object is an adulterous nincompoop who is mostly used as a
shill for the stores (from Payless to Hugo Boss) whose prominence
in the dialogue qualifies as mini-commercials. Every experience
Viktor has is fake, sentimental, or moronic.
While Viktor embarks on the sacred errand that brought him
to New York—one that involves a resealed can of Planter’s
cashews—Frank, a by-the-book bureaucrat appealingly resigned
to the chaos of managing a facility large enough to rival
Viktor’s homeland, is suddenly turned into a hissable villain
intent on getting Viktor locked up. And for apparently for
no other reason than that this fantasy island of capitalism
has to have a conflict (Tucci, so often witty in throwaway
roles, doesn’t disguise his disgust with the material). The
Terminal has more in common with a Hugo Boss suit coat
than any previous Spielberg movie: a shoddy, name-brand product
designed solely to make money.
—Ann
Morrow
Seconds
The
Stepford Wives
Directed
by Frank Oz
Who can forget watching the 1970s Stepford Wives, in
which raven-haired beauty Katharine Ross slowly began to realize
that the mild feminism to which she and friend Paula Prentiss
practiced was enough to send the menfolk to the tool shed
for an out-and-out rehaul of idealized womanhood. That movie
was downright creepy, especially as it evoked an all-too-real
sense of fear at the encroachment into domestic tranquility,
of things like urban decay, gang violence and, well, poor
and nonwhite people. There goes the neighborhood, indeed.
Frank Oz’s remake of the same, this time scripted by Paul
Rudnick, veers away from the horrific and toward the funny,
as in “Hey, Martha, did you catch that one?” Yes, whereas
the old Stepford was dark and ultimately forbidding, despite
the clean houses, today’s Stepford is a cacophony of loud
voices and even louder palettes. This is an oasis to which
its citizens—Mattel-like wives in Lanz sundresses and lumpy
husbands who don’t appear to work—have escaped. In the case
of Joanna Eberhardt (Nicole Kidman) and her milquetoast hubby
Walter (Matthew Broderick), the reason for flight from the
metropolis is, on surface, her mental collapse following the
inglorious short-circuiting of her high powered television
career. In reality, it’s more a matter of getting back to
the basics, revisiting family and forgetting about the rat
race.
All of which seems very easy to do in a town like Stepford,
whose houses are like idealized versions of the abodes of
the rich and famous. As mentioned, nobody appears to have
a job, and while Oz gives no evidence of household or garden
help, everything gleams and the wives—er, robots—are downright
happy. Rudnick’s script, initially, offers subtle zingers
that penetrate our mass- culture, consumerist society, and
that to a very small extent, make us question our assumptions
about what it means to be happy, successful, or fulfilled,
particularly if you happen to be a woman. Unfortunately, such
moments quickly disappear from the screen, and we’re left
with the “madcap” antics of Joanna and her new friends Bobbi
(Bette Midler), one half of the town’s only Jewish couple,
and Roger (Roger Bart), one half of the town’s only gay couple.
Apparently, the filmmakers had a lot of difficulty deciding
how to end the thing, and I’ve read that as many as four different
conclusions were shot. If that’s the case, I’m at a loss to
explain the choice of the keeper (spoiler alert), in which
Joanna and Walter, in a rare show of masculine fortitude,
join forces, à la the Avengers, to unmask head Stepford
honcho Mike (Christopher Walken, suitably creepy) and bring
back to harmony the natural forces of overachieving women
and the duds they love. The whole things comes across as very
rushed, as if Oz and company lacked the verve or maybe just
the imagination to go all out and satirize something, whether
it be marriage, sexuality or the like. Give me the low budget
of the former Stepford Wives, not to mention the infinitely
more interesting Katharine Ross, than this pale imitation
any day.
—Laura
Leon
|