 |
|
The
show will go on: the New York City Ballet.
|
OK,
OK . . . for Now
Members
of Save the Ballet are pleased, but cautious, following the
March 31 decision by the board of directors of the Saratoga
Performing Arts Center to bring back the New York City Ballet
in 2005 for what will be its 40th consecutive year at the
amphitheater.
Pleased, said committee spokeswoman Lisa Mehigan, because
“the board’s decision gives us the opportunity that we’ve
all been working to achieve.” The one-year reprieve will allow
SPAC management to launch new money-raising efforts to assure
the ballet’s continuing summer residency beyond 2005. Save
the Ballet stands ready to help SPAC work on marketing and
promotion, Mehigan said.
However, committee members, including John De Marco, co-owner
of the Lyrical Ballad Antiquarian Bookstore in Saratoga Springs,
are cautious because the SPAC board stated that the ballet’s
long-term residency depends on “financial viability,” which,
according to Herb Chesbrough, president and executive director
of SPAC, translates into a need for increased attendance.
Chesbrough has said SPAC must draw 70,000 to 75,000 people
to the ballet each year for it to be viable. Last summer,
55,496 people came to 21 performances, an increase of 7.6
percent over the 51,558 attendance in 2002.
DeMarco said, “We don’t think 70,000 is doable in such a short
time. Our goal is to reach attendance of 60,000 in 2004, which
would represent a 10 percent increase over last year, and
then to move up from there. Any business owner would be thrilled
with a 10 percent increase in one year.”
A member of the ballet orchestra, who declined to be named,
said, “Compared to our New York City seasons, the summer is
a short season. We do seven concerts a week in Saratoga, and
75,000 people is not possible.”
The ballet has been selling out its 2,700-seat house at the
New York State Theater in Lincoln Center every night during
its winter season, which ended in February. The SPAC amphitheater
holds 5,100 seats. The ballet had record attendance (between
70 and 80 thousand) at SPAC in 1978 and 1979, when Mikhail
Baryshnikov danced here, and again in 1991, when Peter Martins’
new production of Sleeping Beauty had its upstate premiere,
but attendance has remained around 55,000 for the past several
years.
Supporters of the ballet say SPAC has not been actively marketing
and promoting the ballet. For example, SPAC does not advertise
its season in The New York Times (as Tanglewood does);
nor does it place ads in the programs of Jacob’s Pillow, the
Egg, Proctor’s or other regional venues.
SPAC marketing and public relations director Helen Edelman
said her ad budget for the ballet is $85,000. About advertising
in the Jacob’s Pillow program, she said, “We get a report
from the box office that includes the zip codes of ticket
buyers. We don’t have many people from the Berkshires in our
audience. I can’t justify advertising there.”
De Marco, State Assemblyman Jim Tedisco and others are concerned
that SPAC is trying to redefine the issue of who is responsible
for managing the arts center by putting the burden on the
community to increase attendance instead of aggressively meeting
its own responsibilities to promote the ballet and to raise
enough money to bridge the gap between ticket sales and production
costs.
Tedisco said he is disappointed that the SPAC board would
only commit to keeping the ballet through 2005. At a candlelight
vigil March 30 in Saratoga’s Congress Park, Tedisco said he
would offer a resolution in the Legislature to honor founding
choreographer George Balanchine “and to keep the ballet at
SPAC for another 40, 50, or 60 years.”
SPAC has claimed that the ballet’s production costs exceed
revenues by $900,000 each year. At a recent meeting, board
members pledged to contribute $300,000 of their own money
toward the 2005 season. Earlier, New York State Senate Majority
Leader Joseph Bruno offered $300,000 in “member money” in
a $1 for $2 match with funds that SPAC is challenged to raise
by July 2005.
As part of their ongoing campaign to save the ballet, committee
members have gathered more than $150,000 in pledges to buy
extra tickets. Also, balletomanes have sent more than $20,000
in donations to Save the Ballet, which is holding the money
in a special account pending its official designation as a
501c3 charitable organization, expected by the end of this
year. Money donated to this account will go to SPAC only if
the ballet’s residency is continued beyond 2005, according
to Dee Sarno, director of the Saratoga County Arts Council.
In the meantime, SPAC has extended to April 15 its offer to
the public to buy discounted tickets for classical performances.
Also, Chesbrough said SPAC will work to raise $100,000 from
SPAC members and will look for an extra $50,000 from increased
profits from its 2-year-old Wine and Food Festival. So far,
according to tax reports, the fundraising festival has lost
money each year.
A Save the Ballet benefit dinner at Hattie’s Restaurant in
Saratoga Springs netted more than $20,000, including proceeds
from a silent auction. De Marco said a few more fundraisers
are scheduled, including a May 9 event at the Wayside Inn,
Greenfield Center (call 587-4167 for information); also, there
will be a sale of special label “NYCBallet” New York-made
champagne by the Saratoga Wine Exchange, and dance photographic
prints by Lawrence White at the Celeste Susany Gallery in
Saratoga Springs.
—Mae
G. Banner
 |
| Macbeth,
Zulu Warrior |
|
One
of the most consistent things about performances
by Skidmore College’s theater department is the
way it has made experimentation practically a
mandate. (Granted, that’s a lot easier to do when
you’re not depending on ticket sales to keep your
doors open.)
For this spring’s seminar production of Macbeth,
which opens today and runs through April 25, director
Lary Opitz sets his tale of ancient Scotland on
the stage of a modern-day South African people’s
theater. In this telling, Shakespeare’s overreaching
general becomes a Zulu warrior, and native African
music, rituals, and culture inform the play’s
design. The three weird sisters are transformed
into Sangomas, or African diviners, who prophesize
by the throwing of bones and listening to ancestors.
But the production is not emphasizing the supernatural,
Opitz is quick to point out.
“It’s
emphasizing the power of suggestion,” he explains.
And even though it is inspired by the kind of
mixed-race “story theater”-style productions that
emerged in South Africa’s black townships during
apartheid’s waning years, Opitz says this Macbeth
is not ultimately meant to be a political statement—“other
than that Macbeth is a tyrant blinded by ambition.”
What it tries to show is how South Africans today,
still struggling today with crime, poverty and
overcrowding, are doing their best to combine
their many cultures, black and white.
Unlike his Merchant of Venice a few years
back, where Opitz in the title role inserted a
few lines of Yiddish into the text, Macbeth
won’t attempt to use any African dialects. Not
only is “part of the project is to celebrate Shakespeare’s
verse,” the director explains, but the sheer number
of languages in the country and their nature—the
Xhosa clicking language, for one—make it too difficult
to integrate into the Bard’s text.
However, Opitz says he did work to overcome the
challenge of putting together a mixed-race cast
from the largely white Skidmore student body.
Although some of his 14 cast members have never
been on a Skidmore stage before, the process of
working on the play and learning about South Africa
has helped develop a strong sense of company,
he feels, that is “very tight knit and supportive.”
Opitz and his wife Barbara, a movement teacher,
run Skidmore’s Shakespeare Programme every fall
in London, but this will be the first Shakespearian
tragedy to be produced at the school in the 30
years he’s been there. That means a lot of battles,
murder and mayhem—and a lot of opportunity for
the students to practice their combat techniques—but
don’t expect a spectacle along the lines of Roman
Polanski’s blood-drenched 1971 film version.
“The
violence is real, but there’s really no blood,”
Opitz says. “I didn’t want it to be gory, I wanted
it to be exciting.”
—Kathryn
Ceceri
|
|
|