 |
|
Wiving
it wealthily: (L-R) Kim Stauffer and Eric Martin Brown
in Taming of the Shrew. |
True
Love, at a Price
By
Kathryn Lange
The
Taming of the Shrew
By
William Shakespeare, Directed by Maggie Mancinelli-Cahill
Capital
Repertory Theatre, Through March 23
The
central tale of Shakespeare’s classic comedy The Taming
of the Shrew has been reshaped and retold again and again
since it was penned more than four centuries ago. The story
of a conniving young man’s attempts to court a woman who furiously
resists his wooing is timeless. It is not the story itself,
but the Elizabethan framework that makes The Taming of
the Shrew challenging to produce today. By contemporary
standards, the lovely Bianca, object of the town’s affections,
seems primly vapid. Her “devilish” older sister, Kate—wooed
only for her dowry—comes across as feisty; her sharp wit and
fierce individuality almost balance out her volatile temper.
Today the “shrew” seems attractive, and Petruchio’s attempts
to “tame” her, depriving her of sleep, food, and personal
opinion, would be considered spousal abuse.
Director Maggie Mancinelli-Cahill is clearly aware of the
challenges presented by the classic script, and has chosen
to contemporize the tale (not the language) by staging the
production in late-1950s Italy. Mancinelli-Cahill brings Shrew
to ’50s Padua with carefully executed detail. Ted Simpson’s
set—a cobblestone main playing space with a large door up
center, flanked by smaller doorways with balconies above them—easily
transitions from location to location, from indoors to out.
Mancinelli-Cahill keeps the shifting furniture simple, quickly
set between scenes by servants, and makes nice use of the
balcony spaces (particularly in the second act, when the balcony
railing echoes a jail cell or a cage). It is clever and effective
staging for a large show on an intimate stage.
The costumes, designed by Barbara Wolfe, are colorful and
kitschy, and set the tone from the opening. From cotton-candy
and crinoline dresses that make Bianca (Ginny Meyers Lee)
look like an airy confection to Kate’s trimly tailored but
flowing blue pants, the costumes define not only era, but
character, giving the show a boost of accessibility.
Easy opening banter between young aristocrat Lucentio (Chris
Bresky) and his servant Tranio (Michael Keyloun) culminates
in a classic role-reversal a la The Prince and the Pauper,
and a frantic onstage costume change punctuates the transition.
Lucentio dons orange and brown argyle, too-short pants and
horn-rimmed glasses and transforms into the stereotypical
studious ’50s nerd. Bresky’s innocent eagerness and bold physicalities
have the audience laughing from the top, thanks in part to
the tight counterpoint of Kayloun’s smartly playful scheming,
which remains consistently sharp.
The leading players adeptly convey Mancinelli-Cahill’s stylized
concept. Capital Repertory veteran Terry Rabine balances class,
heart and business with glint-eyed ease. Myers Lee offers
a Bianca reminiscent of Sandra Dee before the leather-and-spandex
transformation. Brian Wallace makes Hortensio believable in
the ’50s, sometimes suave, sometimes discomfited. As Petruchio’s
madcap servant, Grumio, Oliver Wadsworth provides comic relief
for the comedy, and, while occasionally over-the-top, he is
wildly energetic and provides many of the shows biggest laughs.
All re-create the broad physicalities and highly presentational
style of ’50s film and television—and well.
Manicinelli-Cahill’s focus on the ’50s concept makes the production
visually tight, fun and familiar. But it is also the show’s
greatest downfall. The presentational style—fraught with mugging,
indication and slapstick gesticulation—delightfully conveys
text and punch lines, and keeps the audience laughing, but
it leaves little room for subtext, honestly or introspection,
all things that the script needs to function in the contemporary
moral climate.
On their first meeting, Kate (Kim Stauffer) and Petruchio
(Eric Martin Brown) are permitted a fresh and complex take
on the initial argument, and play it nicely. A love-at-first-sight
double take makes the ensuing battle of wits more a fight
against their own desires than a fight with each other. Nicely
staged by fight choreographer Parker Cross, the scene is not
a brawl, but a clash of expectation and sexual tension.
Unfortunately, it is one of the very few moments of complexity,
and the dynamic of desire is quickly lost. It quickly becomes
a nearly abusive battle, with little emotional undercurrent.
Even Petruchio’s soliloquies are played to the audience; he
asks, “Know you a better way to tame a shrew?,” shrugs, and
waits for an answer from the crowd. What has the potential
to be an introspective moment of regret at his behavior becomes
an empty and unanswered question.
It seems that Manicinelli-Cahill is trying to convey that
no one was tamed, that the two found true, healthy love, and
each is better for it. It’s a potentially good message, but
one that is not enforced through the production. Stauffer
is able to sneak a few moments of heartfelt undertones, particularly
before the wedding of the mismatched pair. But overall, the
focus on the ’50s trades subtext for accessibility, complexity
for camp, and heart for humor.
If you’re looking for a light, fun evening with lots of well-deserved
laughs, this is a skillfully executed production. If you’re
looking for a meaningful new telling of a complex tale, you
will likely leave wanting more.
The
Beast Inside
Bat
Boy: The Musical
Story
and book by Keythe Farley and Brian Flemming, music and lyrics
by Lawrence O’Keefe, directed by Tom Heckert, musical direction
by Theresa Fitzmaurice, choreography by Jeffrey Scott
Schenectady Light Opera Company, through March 16
From its opening seconds—darkness embraced by the eerie yet
plaintive high-note cries of bats on the wing is suddenly
pierced by white flashlight beams and the shouts of three
teenagers—Schenectady Light Opera Company’s Bat Boy: The
Musical engages the audience with a very funny, lively
production. Inspired by the Weekly World News tabloid’s
ubiquitous “Bat Boy” features—he was the Carmen Sandiego of
the conspiracy theorist/X-Files set—Bat Boy: The
Musical is part Rocky Horror, part My Fair Lady,
part Leave It to Beaver, and is just as weird and serious
as its inspiration. The late Weekly World News (the
last issue ran Aug. 27, 2007) lives on in this spirited, goofy,
and yet oddly earnest and poignant musical; any work that
ends with its cast singing “No more need to hide!/Know your
Bat Boy./Love your Bat Boy/Don’t deny your beast inside!”
has a big heart, no matter its species.
Backed by the strong playing of musical director Theresa Fitzmaurice’s
five-piece band (Rob Aronstein on keyboards, Sam Farkas on
a blistering electric guitar, Stephen Aldi on bass, Andrew
Hearn’s strong percussion and Fizmurice’s piano), director
Tom Heckert creates a fast-paced, smart production and gets
solid work out of his cast of 15. The story may be 1950s B
sci-fi movie camp, but the director has his cast playing it
straight. Occasional moments of tongue-in-cheek or doofy excess
take the air out of the production in its second act, but
until then, SLOC’s Bat Boy: The Musical is excellent.
The 21 songs have a high-pitched energy that carries them
even through the indulgences, and the performances often are
stellar. As the eponymous character, Sean Patrick Fagan is
fantastic. Emitting guttural noises while hanging upside down
in his cage, he seems more bat than boy. Fagan superbly portrays
Batboy’s transition to civility, from learning to speak English
from the June Cleaverish Mrs. Parker (sweetly sung and acted
by Laurie Larson) to his splendid enunciation while wooing
the hostile town of Hope Falls, W. Va. (nothing is coincidental
in this musical, and symbolism is allegory-heavy). “Let Me
Walk Among You,” sung to the attendants of a Hope Falls revival
meeting, wouldn’t be that out of place in a contemporary musical
translation of the New Testament.
The protean Fagan is aided by Bat Boy’s inappropriate soulmate,
Shelley Parker (a vivacious Molly McGrath who not only can
do the dreaded American Idol belt-the-high-notes-until-you-leave-a-welt,
but can actually sing with emotional honesty, too). The duo’s
duet, “Inside Your Heart,” almost redeems the second act from
the simultaneous breakdown of the musical’s book and Heckert’s
staging. There’s some clunky backstory that sucks the air
out of the theater during an extended flashback, and a clunkier
orgy that almost literally “jumps the shark,” with various
cast members in bad team-mascot costumes miming interspecies
breeding (think of a cross between bestiality and Mr. Rogers’
Neighborhood).
But the aforementioned closing, the stellar first act, and
Fagan’s performance more than make up for shortcomings in
act two. SLOC’s Bat Boy: The Musical deserves to be
seen: Don’t dream it, be it, or, rather, “don’t deny your
beast inside.”
—James
Yeara
|