 |
|
Smoke-filled
room: The home of the Albany City Majority Party Committee.
PHOTO: Joe Putrock
|
A
New Back Room
The
emergence of the Albany City Majority Party Committee makes
this election year just a little bit more complicated
Albany
County Legislator Lucille McKnight (D-District 2), a 15-year
incumbent, was confused. She thought that she had the endorsement
of the Democratic Committee. And yet, she was told by some
Albany residents that her opponent, Lester Freeman, had the
backing of the Democratic Committee as well. As McKnight has
come to understand it, she does have the endorsement of the
Albany County Democratic Committee, while Freeman has the
backing of the Albany City Majority Party Committee, a committee
that has yet to officially announce its existence, structure,
bylaws or membership. Although the Albany County Democratic
Committee allowed the city of Albany to begin putting together
its own committee, not many people involved in Albany politics
seem too clear on who is actually a part of the new committee,
when its meetings are held, or by what authority it is endorsing
candidates.
“There
is an exclusive group of people who even know that it exists,”
said Albany Common Council President Shawn Morris. Morris
said that as far as she knows there has not been an official
election to determine the structure of the Albany City Majority
Party Committee. “As far as I know, through various conversations,
most people who are [Albany County] committee people were
never notified of an election. So it is basically a rogue
committee holding itself out as an entity.”
Meetings
of the committee are said to be held at the Democratic Social
Club at 901 South Pearl St., and some longtime volunteers
at the county committee headquarters on Colvin Avenue are
said to now spend time manning phones at the South Pearl Street
location. A fund-raising letter written by Albany Mayor Jerry
Jennings was sent out in early June asking for donations to
support committee-endorsed candidates.
Some
ward leaders and committee people also have been confused
and shocked to find out that a set of petitions is being circulated
by fellow Democrats with different candidates than the county-endorsed
ones. These petitions feature a slate of candidates endorsed
by the city committee, and at the top of the list reportedly
is Albany County Comptroller Mike Conners. Insiders say that
some committee members who want to petition in support of
the county Democratic slate of endorsed candidates instead
feel they have to petition for the city-endorsed candidates,
because they fear retribution from City Hall and think that
their jobs with the city may be at stake.
Albany
County Legislator Thomas Monjeau (D-District 7), who is likely
to face a primary opponent this year, said that he was surprised
by the existence of the city committee. “I heard my ward leader
say the city committee is endorsing Mike Conners, and I said,
‘What city committee?’ I guess they are in the process of
creating their bylaws, doing what they need to do to get up
and running, but I don’t know when it is going to be official.
But it will definitely make things interesting for politics
in Albany.”
Although
some see the tension between the city committee and the county
committee as a split between city and suburban factions, in
this election year, the focus of the split is more obviously
the contentious race between incumbent Conners and challenger
Patricia Slavick for Albany County comptroller. Conners earned
the wrath of a majority of established Albany County politicians
when he switched parties to run as a Republican against Sen.
Neil Breslin (D-Albany). After his loss to Breslin, Conners
returned to the Democratic Party and has since faced a Democratic
primary each time he has run for re-election as comptroller.
Conners tried unsuccessfully to win the endorsement of the
Albany County committee this year, but now has the support
of the city committee.
Conners
acknowledged that the existence of the city committee has
some people upset. “It is fine for the suburban towns to have
committees, it is fine for Green Island, it is fine for the
city of Watervliet to have a committee, it was never a problem
for Cohoes, but now that the City of Albany has a committee,
all of a sudden everyone is upset,” he said. “It is somewhat
ironic. It is almost like how no one had problems when suburbs
spent money at the airport, but when you try to start a project
in the inner city, people are up in arms.”
Sen.
Breslin said that he sees the city committee not as a voice
for Albany but for that of one man. “The city committee is
obviously Mayor Jennings, and it appears as though Jennings
has decided to side with Mike Conners in a very open, direct
way which I consider unfortunate, given that he is not the
candidate of the Albany County Democratic Party.”
Critics
of the city committee insist that in its current state, the
Albany City Majority Party Committee is simply a tool of Jennings,
who cannot push his agenda through the Albany County Democratic
Committee, which was split by a controversial election last
year that ended in a court decision that made Frank Commisso
and David Bosworth committee co-chairs. Although the initial
struggle between Commisso and Bosworth was seen as a fight
between city and suburban factions, insiders say both are
working together now for the county as a whole.
State
Assemblyman Jack McEneny (D-Albany) said, “I think anything
that would divide Albany County is bad for the party and the
people of the county themselves.”
McKnight
feels she is facing a challenger sponsored by the city committee
because of political retribution from Jennings. She further
feels that as a longtime resident of the South End and also
as the president of the New York State Association of Counties,
she should have been notified about the creation of the city
committee.
Conners
said that he believes established politicians are worried
that the existence of the city committee will increase the
number of primaries, not only this year but especially “in
an even-numbered election year.”
Conners
said, however, that he has grown accustomed to primaries.
“Primaries are good, you just run a positive campaign and
talk about what you have done.”
Jennings
and Commisso did not return calls for this article. Other
representatives of the city committee could not be reached.
—David
King
dking@metroland.net
 |
| What
a Week |
|
We’re
Just Sayin’
Nearly
half of the country’s citizens—45 percent—want
to see President George W. Bush impeached, according
to a poll recently published by the New Hampshire-based
American Research Group. The study asked 1,100
U.S. adults a series of questions, which included
whether or not they favored the House of Representatives
beginning impeachment proceedings against Bush.
ARG asked the same about Vice President Dick Cheney
and found that the American public is even less
impressed with him—54 percent approve of impeaching
Cheney. Maybe this ill will felt toward the current
administration has to do with another question
the poll asked: nearly 70 percent of voters disapprove
of Bush commuting Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s 30-month
prison sentence.
Woe
Is McCain
Republican
presidential candidate John McCain (R-Ariz.) received
a couple of blows to his presidential-campaign
ego Tuesday. Terry Nelson, McCain’s campaign manager,
and John Weaver, a senior advisor and close friend
of the senator, each announced that they were
resigning from their positions on the campaign
trail, leaving McCain in the dust. The hits just
seem to keep coming for the Arizona senator, who
was demoted to third place in the Republican presidential
race after campaign funding numbers referenced
the measly $11 million raised for his campaign.
By comparison, the former governor of Massachusetts
and Republican frontrunner, Mitt Romney, has raised
nearly twice that amount.
King
of the Ring
No
one ever accused State Senate Majority Leader
Joseph Bruno (R-Brunswick) of not being feisty.
If old Joltin’ Joe knows anything it is how to
go on the offensive. In response to the accusations
made by Gov. Eliot Spitzer about Bruno’s overuse
of state-funded transportation, Bruno has demanded
that Attorney General Andrew Cuomo investigate
Spitzer’s alleged misuse of the New York State
Police, because he says Spitzer had the police
spy on him. Furthermore, Bruno has accused the
Times Union of trying to get him to pay
for equal coverage, and canceled his subscription.
Perhaps the Brunswick Bruiser can settle his score
with the Manhattan Mauler, and everyone else,
with a few rounds at the Joe.
|
|
 |
Too
Little, Way Too Late
Recent
legislation rectifies a decade-long exploitation of prison
families—but some activists say it is still not enough
Alison Coleman spent between $20,000 and $30,000 on phone
bills during the 25 years her husband was in a New York state
prison. She had her phone blocked despite timely payments;
she spent days following unclear directions, trying to renew
contact with her husband. Coleman saw money set aside for
food spent to maintain a relationship between herself and
her husband as well as between her husband and their children.
“Our
children needed their dad, and to allow that to happen, I
had to accept collect calls,” said Coleman, director of Prison
Families of New York, an organization dedicated to providing
support to the loved ones of incarcerated men and women. All
phone contact between prisoners and the outside world must
be made through collect calls initiated from inside the prison.
Since 1996, the state has maintained an exclusive contract
with MCI/Verizon that allowed the company to charge a $3 connection
fee, plus 16 cents per minute, for all calls made from state
prisons—a 630-percent markup from regular calls—with the state
itself collecting a profitable kickback of 57.5 percent of
those fees.
Legislation signed last month by Gov. Eliot Spitzer orders
that the state must actively seek the lowest market prices
for phone service and provide billing options for families.
This legislation, the Family Connections Bill, also solidifies
the governor’s January decision to eliminate the state’s cut.
“As
a family member, [the legislation] has definitely allowed
for greater opportunities for communication between me and
my loved ones, as the phone bills are now less than half of
what they were,” said Denise Barnes, an administrator for
Prison Families Community Forum in an online conversation.
Barnes’ husband currently is serving a 15-to-life term in
a New York state prison; she used to pay approximately $10
a day to speak with him.
“Now
that the legislature has passed the Family Connections Bill,
my calls are back to approximately $3 to $5 for 30 minutes,”
she said, “which is much more feasible.”
Although the changes have been well received, some activists
say that they will continue the struggle with the state Department
of Correctional Services to recoup losses from the decade
of what they call “unconstitutional taxation.”
A day after Gov. Spitzer eliminated the state’s percentage,
the Center for Constitutional Rights went before the state
Court of Appeals to argue the case of Ivey Walton vs. NYSDOCS,
on behalf of a woman affected by the exorbitant rates for
years.
“The
most important part of this case is getting the state to recognize
that what it did was unconstitutional,” said Rachel Meeropol,
an attorney with the CCR. “My clients had to use money that
should have gone towards groceries. Compensation is important.”
CCR has asked the courts to allow the suit to become classified
as a class action, which will allow the organization to represent
multiple parties affected by these fees.
Many prison activists, in the meantime, are excited by the
prospects of continuing to work with Spitzer.
“When
Gov. Spitzer came in, the doors not only opened, they fell
down. All it took was a governor that didn’t see us as cash
cows,” said Coleman, who is working to make the DOCS the most
pro-family organization it can be. Ideally, she would like
to see a New York State Office of Prison Family Affairs created,
though realistically, and despite the recent legislation,
Coleman realizes there is a long way to go.
“For
me, it’s an unfolding landscape,” she said. “It’s just a piece
of a huge puzzle we have to put together.”
—Carlene
Willsie
Approved
With Force
The
Albany Common Council’s Public Safety Committee votes to recommend
the creation of a gun-violence task force
If
you had asked Dominick Calsolaro (D-Ward 1) a month ago whether
the gun-violence task force he had been pushing for years
would make it out of the Albany Common Council’s Public Safety
Committee anytime soon, he would have told you not to hold
your breath. And yet this Tuesday (July 10), the committee
voted unanimously to recommend its passage.
If
approved by the Common Council Monday (July 15), the Albany
mayor would appoint six members to the task force and the
council would appoint seven, with the council naming the chair.
According to Calsolaro, the task force would be a center to
focus on gun-violence statistics and to communicate with those
affected by it. It would last for one year.
The crowd that gathered to watch the vote overflowed the four
court benches. Albany Police Chief James Tuffey, who had previously
been against the task force, spoke at the beginning of the
meeting about the causes of violence in the home. Then Common
Councilman and Public Safety Committee Chairman James Scalzo
(D-Ward 10) assured the crowd that the committee needed no
convincing to vote positively for the task force.
The crowd was not deterred, and nearly every audience member
took their turn to speak. Allison Banks, a gun-violence activist,
and Robin Ringler, an activist who took care of former President
Ronald Reagan when he was shot, lent their support to the
task force and announced they were reviving the upstate chapter
of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence.
Norbert Quezner of Delmar, who is the Capital Region director
of the National Rifle Association, told the Public Safety
Committee that salad forks could be used as weapons just as
well as guns could, informed the crowd that the issue they
are facing is one of social and moral decay and suggested:
“Why not form an Urban Violence Task Force?”
—David
King dking@metroland.net
 |
|
PHOTO: Chris Shields |
Cleaning
House
The
Troy Food Co-op, according to its board of directors, is still
a few months away from a planned opening in October. In the
meantime, volunteers are keeping themselves busy spreading
the word, looking for members, and cleaning out the former
Pioneer Market at 77-81 Congress St. This Friday (June 30),
the co-op hosted a flea market to sell off all of the clothes,
records, and other assorted knick-knacks in the backrooms
and basement.
| Loose
Ends |
|
-no
loose ends this week-
|
|
|