By James
Yeara
The
Merry Wives of Windsor
By William
Shakespeare, directed by Tony Simotes
Shakespeare
& Company, Lenox, Mass., through Sept. 2
At 3,018
lines, with 2,703 in prose, and only 227 in blank verse, The
Merry Wives of Windsor is one of Shakespeare’s longer
plays. It’s also one of his least poetical, least rhythmic,
and least organic; “prosaic” can describe Merry Wives
unless a production of it lives up to the term “play” in all
its meanings.
As befits
Shakespeare’s most domestic comedy, Shakespeare & Company’s
production of The Merry Wives of Windsor is a work
that celebrates the domestic upheavals of multiple domiciles,
leaving the audience with an appreciation of Elizabethan fashion
and modern stagecraft. The sets, costuming, lights, and sound
were all excellent. Director Tony Simotes has well-blocked
The Merry Wives of Windsor; the cast elocuted the text
with clarity. The movements were exactingly executed, and
all was as well-scrubbed and aseptic display of Elizabethan
frippery as a theater maven would hope to find in the vast
museums of Berkshire theaters. This is a The Merry Wives
of Windsor short on “merry” and long on “Windsor,” the
seat of royalty. It has the colors and pomp of a coronation—and
also all the mirth of one.
As befits
the 18th-century belief that the play was created at Queen
Elizabeth’s request, The Merry Wives of Windsor centers
on two desperate housewives of Windsor (a suburb of London
full of wisteria), Mistress Alice Ford (the lovely Elizabeth
Aspenlieder) and her best friend, Mistress Meg Page (the lovely
Corinna May), Mistress Ford’s irrationally jealous husband
Master Ford (the handsome Michael Hammond), and the errant
knight Sir John Falstaff (the regal Malcolm Ingram) of Henry
IV fame. For their money and their honey, Falstaff woos
both Ford and Page, who conspire to humiliate Falstaff; they
do, repeatedly, significantly in a laundry basket filled with
filthy clothes and, at his second attempt at seducing them,
by dressing him as a woman. Coupled with the various disguises
all 21 characters wear at one time or another, The Merry
Wives of Windsor could be retitled Much Ado About Couture.
Resident
costume designer Arthur Oliver and assistant costume designer
Jessie Darrell outdo themselves; the clothes do make the man
and woman here. The rich palette of colors and fabrics fill
the stage and hold the eye. The costuming is the fun of this
The Merry Wives of Windsor. The French farthingales
(bum rolls) of the women’s costumes accentuate their womanliness
even as the padding of Sir John Falstaff’s crimson-with-gold-diagonal-slashes
matching doublet (jacket) and galligaskins (pants) accentuates
his manliness. The copper and black doublet of Master Ford,
topped with his feathered Cavalier hat, screams “dashing”
even before he dashes about in his mad jealous dashes. Each
character, from Dr. Caius’ (the always excellent Jonathan
Croy) baby-blue matching doublet and galligaskins to Justice
Shallow’s (a devilish Mel Cobb) in midnight satin matching
black frock coat and pants with gold piping galore, white
stockings and shirt, was richly detailed, a specific burst
of color and fabric that had all the fun and intrigue of Project
Runway. Oliver and Darrell’s work was a sight to behold.
Prisoners
With Money
A
Nervous Smile
By John
Belluso, directed by Maria Mileaf
Williamstown
Theatre Festival, Williamstown, Mass., through Aug. 6
It would
seem the Nikos Stage has become the place to see edgy new
plays with dynamic female protagonists. Between last year
and this year, five out of the six offerings have had terrific
female lead performances, even when the material (Lucy
and the Conquest) was lacking. Arriving none too late
to return dignity to the WTF, A Nervous Smile is in
line with last summer’s best offerings there, Tough Titty
and The Sugar Syndrome, the later of which was also
directed by Maria Mileaf.
Like
those two, A Nervous Smile takes a tough issue and
explores it with lucid, sensitive direction and stellar performances
of the sort Mileaf nurtured in Sugar Syndrome; Mileaf
is clearly an actors’ director and someone to keep an eye
on. The issue here is the toll that caring for severely handicapped
children exacts on their parents. As such, the play is kin
to Peter Nichols’ 1967 black comedy, A Day in the Death
of Joe Egg, and like Nichols, John Belluso is unafraid
of writing sharp-tongued dialogue that represents the anger,
bitterness and even rage that caregivers can feel towards
their helpless and demanding charges.
While
not as daring, dark or exhaustive as Joe Egg, A
Nervous Smile approaches its subject with less humor but
with a similarly realistic approach in its depiction of oppressed
parents who consider extreme solutions to their burdens. Some
moments, however, don’t seem entirely of a piece with the
prevailing style of the play; the problem is in the suddenness
with which the not-quite-fully-baked solutions are introduced
and accepted. This is more the style of melodrama than naturalistic
drama, but Mileaf and her cast don’t allow us to question
it for long in this rapidly unfolding, neatly paced work.
Providing
some of the nervous smiles are Amy Brenneman and Scott Cohen
as Eileen and Brian, parents of Emily, a teenager whose cerebral
palsy leaves her screaming to be cleaned, diapered, massaged
and otherwise tended. Even the fact that Eileen’s great wealth
allows them to have full-time help in the form of Blanka (a
piquant Deidre O’Connell with a juicy Russian accent), Emily
wants to be cared for by her parents. Also, despite her crippled
condition, Emily has use of new technology that reveals the
presence of intelligence.
Gloria
Ruben also hides secret smiles as Nicole, an attorney whose
18-year-old son’s cerebral palsy is even more debilitating
than Emily’s. Having met Eileen and Brian in a parents’ support
group, Gloria has become their close friend.
Their
stresses have led to the aforementioned anger as well as infidelity
and, in Eileen’s case, a perpetual nervous condition alleviated
only by drugs, sarcasm, stunning forthrightness—and a desperate
hope pinned on an unusual escape plan.
Cohen
bravely allows Brian to seem the least sympathetic of the
three, but even in Brian’s selfishness Cohen enlists our empathy.
His lengthy monologue wherein he spews his venom at years
of servitude and compares Emily to a vampire is powerful and
thought-provoking.
As the
mothers whose maternal instincts are put to the most severe
of tests, Brenneman and Rubin are spectacular, and each reveals
small, excruciatingly truthful moments that raise the stakes
while enlisting our identification. Despite the emotional
hoops Belluso makes Nicole jump through, Ruben executes the
challenge with an Olympian gymnast’s skill and poise. As Eileen,
Brenneman occupies the center of the play and must travel
the greatest arc, one that ends with a dangerous swan dive
into uncharted waters. The production is fortunate to have
Brenneman, who provides a remarkable grounding presence even
as she is at the precipice of Belluso’s high diving board.
Vincent
Mountain’s clean, almost neurotically perfect setting of Brian
and Eileen’s rich digs proves that the Nikos Stage’s carpentry
department hasn’t forgotten how to build sound and inviting,
representational sets. It also strongly underlines the playwright’s
additional concern with privilege and money.
Belluso,
who died earlier this year, raises significant questions about
the latter in an era when technological advances can bring
abrupt changes and offer help, hope and meaning—to those who
can afford it.
—Ralph
Hammann