 |
|
Power
and love: Velvet and Thrash III, one of Barbara
Nitke’s photographs that she has kept on her Web site.
photo:Barbara
Nitke
|
Is
the Bible Belt Your ‘Local Community’?
By
Miriam Axel-Lute
The
Supreme Court sets an impossible standard for proving threats
to artistic speech on the Internet
The
Communications Decency Act of 1996, in a part not ruled
unconstitutional in 1997, officially extended existing obscenity
law to cover the Internet. The currently used definition of
“obscene” material is something that “arouses the prurient
interest of the viewer,” violates “local community standards,”
and does not have any “serious literary, artistic, or political
social value,” based on a nationwide standard. “Obscene” material
is not protected by the First Amendment.
But in a climate where the Department of Justice has announced
it will step up obscenity prosecutions, what defines the “local
community” of an Internet site? Who judges social value?
These questions worried Barbara Nitke. Nitke is a Manhattan-based
photographer and professor at the School of Visual Arts whose
work has been displayed in galleries and museums. Her subjects
are sexually explicit: Recently her focus has been on portraits
of people in the S&M community. While many samples of
her work are online, she has also kept some of her work off
her Web site, for fear of prosecution under the CDA.
So in 2001, Nitke, along with the National Coalition for Sexual
Freedom, which has several members who also felt that their
speech had been suppressed by the CDA, challenged the CDA
in the U.S. District Court of southern New York as unconstitutionally
overbroad.
According to previous case law, a statute is overbroad if
it restricts a “substantial” amount of protected free speech,
“judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep.”
However, John Wirenius, Nitke’s lawyer, said that the court
held them to an impossible standard of “substantial.” “They
required you to look at the entire universe of Web sites affected
by the statute,” he explained. “That would mean finding, evaluating,
downloading, every single adult-oriented site on the Web .
. . and comparing them to the local community standards of
every community in America.”
Wirenius did his best to prove that the CDA was not only resulting
in substantial chilling of speech that would be protected
in some communities, but also that it was chilling speech,
like Nitke’s, that had artistic or social merit, and therefore
ought to be protected throughout the country. “We had a lot
of evidence that there is speech that will get differentially
treated, and speech that will be silenced because of that,”
said Wirenius. “We submitted over 1,000 examples of such speech.”
He brought expert witnesses who had reviewed hundreds of obscenity
prosecutions and showed that there are hot spots of prosecution,
while other places that are very protective of free speech.
This is dangerous, added expert witness attorney Jeffrey Douglas,
because the federal government can and does “venue cases of
online distribution of allegedly obscene materials in any
community in which the material may be received, leading to
the selection of those having the most restrictive standards.”
The Justice Department admitted that Nitke’s speech has artistic
merit. In its decision last July, the district court acknowledged
that she had reason to fear prosecution of her protected speech
under the CDA, and even acknowledged that the artistic merit
test was not likely to be applied consistently from jurisdiction
to jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the court determined that “the
plaintiffs presented insufficient evidence” to show that the
statute was overbroad.
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court, without hearing any further
testimony, agreed, issuing a four-word decision on the case:
“The judgment is affirmed.”
Essentially, said Wirenius, the court said Nitke should “enter
a defense in a criminal trial [if she were prosecuted] and
take her chances.” In other words, he said, trust that the
system will work, even though we’ve just admitted it frequently
doesn’t.
The implications of this decision will be huge. But it won’t
mean the end of Internet porn. “We’re not going to see an
erosion of all sexually explicit material being available,”
said Wirenius, noting that corporate porn purveyors can afford
to risk lawsuits. “It’s going to reduce the amount of artists,
lifestylers, people who are really speaking from the heart
about a different view of what sexuality should be. They’re
the ones who are going to be silenced.”
“It
was very disheartening,” and will add to a legal climate that
is having a chilling effect on the art, and careers, of her
and other artists, said Nitke. “When we were [first] bringing
the case there were very few artists who were self-censoring
. . . and now there are a lot, because people are seeing the
prosecutions happening.”
But she’s not giving up. “I couldn’t do my work in any other
country in the world,” she said, “and I want to make sure
I can continue to do it in this country.”
She and Wirenius are investigating next steps, perhaps trying
to support people in other related lawsuits. Nitke is collecting
stories of artists who have taken down images or Web sites
for fear of prosecution. (Send to info@barbaranitke.com.)
Robb Goldstein, an internationally known author on S&M
topics who lives in the Capital Region and whose picture appears
on the cover of Nitke’s book, has also chosen not to post
pictures to his Web site due to the CDA, but he says there’s
an even greater issue in this case: “Everyone who wanted to
see Barbara’s work can’t . . . 250 million Americans have
lost their right to assembly.”
The Internet redefined the idea of community, he explained,
with people “assembling” virtually around a particular idea,
site, or discussion. “I think the Web is the [new] liberty
tree,” he said. “If someone in Podunk says this is obscene,
and stops the . . . rest of us from assembling, speech can’t
follow. . . . Once artistic speech gets chilled, it’s pretty
easy to see what comes next.”
—Miriam
Axel-Lute
maxel-lute@metroland.net
 |
| What
a Week |
|
Move
Over, Casinos
Cecilia
Fire Thunder, president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe
on South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Reservation, has
added her voice to the chorus of people distressed
by the state law banning abortions, and state
Sen. Bill Napoli’s comments about who deserves
an abortion. But Fire Thunder is in a unique position
to do something about it: She vowed to establish
a Planned Parenthood clinic on her own land, which,
being on the reservation, is outside of the state’s
jurisdiction. Of course Planned Parenthood has
yet to sign on, and whether Fire Thunder can raise
enough funds for an independent clinic is another
question. Pine Ridge is one of the poorest places
in the United States.
Good
Job
Bonnie
Hoag, director of the Dionondehowa Wildlife Sanctuary
& School in Shushan, was one of 28 women from
around the world to win a 2006 Women of the Earth
award from the Yves Rocher Foundation and L’institut
de France. She was flown to Paris to receive the
award, which she received for her work with the
sanctuary, on International Women’s Day. The DWSS
is a 217-acre nonprofit land trust on the Battenkill.
At
Your Fingertips
Paranoid
Capital Region consumers can now make more sanitary-conscious
decisions about where to eat, get a haircut, or
even get a pedicure by going on the Internet.
Restaurant inspections done by the Albany County
Department of Health since October 2005 are now
available at www.albanycounty.com, and the results
of disciplinary hearings involving nail salons,
barbers, and many other companies and individuals
licensed by the New York Department of State now
can be found at www.dos.state.ny.us/ooah/decisions.html.
We’re
So Thrilled
According
to a survey of 1,000 drivers taken by the national
car insurer Response Insurance, more than half
of American drivers admit they don’t bother to
use turn signals when changing lanes. The excuses
range from laziness to forgetfulness, but the
most disturbing may be the 7 percent who said
forgoing the turn signal “adds excitement to driving.”
The Driving Habits Survey also indicated that
men are less likely to use turn signals than women,
and younger drivers less likely than older drivers.
|
|
 |
Closer
Than You Think
Critics
slam Spitzer for comparing upstate to Appalachia, but some
of it is Appalachia
During
a speech a few weeks ago, Eliot Spitzer compared upstate New
York to Appalachia. His exact quote: “You drive from Schenectady
over to Niagara Falls, you see an upstate economy that is
devastated. It looks like Appalachia. This is not the New
York we dream of.” Quick to defend their territory, Republicans
claimed Spitzer’s comments were off-base, insensitive and
insulting to the citizens of upstate. Critics asserted Spitzer
was dismissing upstaters as slack-jawed yokels, and for a
minute there it seemed our presumptive governor-elect had
opened up the first chink in his armor.
But in
their haste to separate upstate from the image of poverty-stricken,
backwoods West Virginia, Spitzer’s critics may have made some
hasty statements of their own. In some of his first comments
since his health scare, Gov. George Pataki joined in the chorus
of Republican voices chastising Spitzer, declaring, “Appalachia
doesn’t have Empire Zones.” But Appalachia does have Empire
Zones: Pataki put them there.
There
are 14 counties in upstate New York that are part of the Appalachian
region. According to The New York Times, our state
has received $2.5 million dollars from the Appalachian Regional
Commission, a federal- and state-run commission that exists
to aid Appalachia’s faltering economy. Although critics have
tried to connect Spitzer’s Appalachia comparison to offhand
remarks made by Ed Koch that alienated upstaters during his
gubernatorial bid, Spitzer has had facts on his side. And
his campaign has made sure to share them: According to the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, upstate’s job-growth rate
was lower than any of the other 11 Appalachian states from
January 1996 to January 2006. According to the Public Policy
Institute, from 1990 to 2004 alone, upstate New York lost
33 percent of its manufacturing base, while the base in many
Appalachian states grew. Kentucky gained 38,000 auto jobs
after 1979 and North Carolina and Tennessee gained more than
10,000 each.
Spitzer’s
comments have also been backed up by those in the state who
say they see the despair, financial ruin and crumbling cities
Spitzer was referring to. In a letter to the Rochester
Democrat and Chronicle, Chuck Simmins wrote, “I drive
to Main Street every day from one of the northern burbs. I
drive by abandoned buildings, openly visible drug deals, buildings
in disrepair, and vacant lots. The inner cities of Western
New York are as impoverished and destitute as Appalachia.
As much as I despise Spitzer, it’s not a bad analogy.”
Even
Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno (R-Brunswick) has said that
he agrees with Spitzer’s comments, stating, “There are real
poverty pockets throughout the state. . . . Sure, we have
places that desperately need help.”
So what
has the stir the Appalachia comment caused done for the man
who uttered it? It has given Spitzer the forum and the attention
he needs to discuss his plans for repairing the decaying economies
of upstate New York. What briefly looked like Spitzer’s first
misstep has been turned into opportunity. As Spitzer said
at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School, in a speech on revitalizing
the economic lives of cities, “If we’re honest about it, we
must acknowledge that many cities in New York state are in
a state of crisis. But as many of you have heard me say, a
crisis is a terrible thing to waste.”
—David
King
dking@metroland.net.
 |
| Overheard |
|
Overheard:
“Delaware
Avenue’s haunted.”
“Delaware
Avenue?”
“Yeah.
Something bad happened there.”
—CDTA Route 18 bus, in the midst of a discussion
of haunted houses.
Overheard:“Question
his manhood.”
—Ralph
Nader, at a press conference Tuesday supporting
Alice Green, in response to a question about how
Green could convince Mayor Jerry Jennings to participate
in a debate.
|
|
 |
| Loose
Ends |
|
Two
local self-published books [“DIY Books,”
Nov. 17, 2005], Saving Troy and The
Long Stair, have defied conventional wisdom
by selling enough to enter second print runs.
. . . Infuriating Mayor Gerald Jennings, the New
York State Legislature took out $322 million in
state aid that Gov. Pataki had promised the city
of Albany through 2038 from a local government
aid bill, the Times Union reported Tuesday
(March 28). Much of that money was to support
the hotel portion of Albany’s convention center
plan [“Convention Wisdom,” March 2]. The Legislature
is offering one year of extra aid, and legislators
disagreed with Jennings’ assessment that this
move would kill the convention center project.
. . . Publishing house Crown Books has donated
$100 to the Albany Public Library in memory of
the late author Rodney Whitaker, aka Trevanian
[“Assumed Identity,” May 26, 2005], confirming
his identity. A library spokesman told the Times
Union they were “delighted” with the gift
|
|
|